The Broncos got off to a rough start in Super Bowl XLVIII with some miscommunication between Peyton Manning and his center. |
Eric Meyer
Peyton Manning completed 34 of 49 passes for 280 yards, a
touchdown and two interceptions. His passer rating was a meager 73.5. Manning
also had a fumble and missed twice on fourth down opportunities. The supposed
greatest offense in NFL history scored a measly 8 points to Seattle’s 43 in
Super Bowl XLVIII. Talk about a choke job, right?
Wrong.
The narrative of Peyton Manning being a lackluster
postseason performer has some merit. An 11-12 postseason record (1-2 in Super
Bowls) along with some less-than-stellar statistics give that argument some
life. Manning hasn’t always had his best showings in January and has lost in
pretty shocking and ignominious fashion in the past. But that narrative is
inappropriate right now.
The reality is that Manning and the Denver Broncos lost on
Sunday because they played a team that was so much better than them that they
couldn’t even put up a fight. The narrative for this game ought to be that
Seattle’s historically good defense went out and destroyed the league’s top
offense.
Any talk of the Broncos squandering an opportunity or
“choking” or not showing up is an insult to Seattle’s dominance. The fact is
that the Broncos didn’t have a chance to choke. They didn’t have an opportunity
to squander. They simply could not compete.
NFL fans, and even experts, do a funny thing when it comes
to discussing quarterbacks and their legacies. Countless pundits and analysts
will say that Sunday’s loss will stain Manning’s legacy, that he can’t be the
greatest ever with a losing record in the Super Bowl.
What these pundits don’t realize is that by slamming Peyton
Manning for not performing, they are implying that Seattle was a defense that
Manning should have been able to beat. That couldn’t be further from the truth.
You can say that Manning played poorly, and you’d be absolutely right. But he
played poorly because Seattle forced him to hurry, to force it, and to throw
underneath for minimal yardage.
The only conclusion that I draw about Denver from Sunday’s
game is that their offense, and by extension Manning, was slightly overrated
this year. Manning was the no-brainer MVP and his record-setting season
deserves praise. However, the “greatest offense in NFL history” should score
more than 8 points, regardless of whom they’re playing.
Denver had the luxury of playing a weak schedule almost all
season, which undoubtedly inflated their scoring statistics. They had a perfect
storm of sublime quarterbacking, a phenomenal supporting cast and a full
helping of weak defenses to abuse. They shattered records as a result.
Because of their prowess, we put Denver on a pedestal. We
concluded that they were an unstoppable unit and assumed Seattle would simply
have to contain Manning, not dominate him. As a result, we act shocked. But we
shouldn’t be.
Seattle’s defense was vastly superior to Denver’s offense,
and it showed. Some would say that this was an embarrassing loss for Denver,
but as Manning said, “The word ‘embarrassing’ is an insulting word, to tell you
the truth.” I couldn’t agree more with that assessment.
No comments:
Post a Comment