Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Monday Night Football Afterword: Cowboys vs Bears

In the first game of October (Breast Cancer Awareness Month in the NFL)
the Cowboys hosted the Bears on Monday Night Football on ESPN

Some people would look at the 34-18 final score of last night’s Monday Night game and assume that the Bears played a complete game, the kind of game we expected them to be capable of heading into this season but had yet to see.

I saw something very different in watching the game. I saw the Cowboys have opportunity after opportunity to move the ball and stay in the game. Then I saw the Dallas receivers let down their quarterback (neither of the first two interceptions Tony Romo were his fault) with more dropped passes than I care to count.

What do you expect a quarterback to do when his receivers are failing and the other team is running away from you at Mach 1? Down by two touchdowns heading into the fourth quarter and feeling like you have nobody on your offense you can rely on has to be a hopeless feeling. I’m glad I wasn’t in Romo’s position; I’m a fighter, but even I might have packed up and turned in for the night in that situation.

Romo fought through, but he was panicked. He saw open receivers, but they weren’t as open as he thought. He made some poor decisions and threw three more interceptions that are his fault, at least mostly. But even I, a Redskins fan who very much dislikes the Cowboys, who has hated on ‘Tony Homo’ for as long as he’s been a starter in Big D, cannot fault Romo fully for those those three additional picks.

I have a feeling that, had his receivers not proved to be so unreliable and the game gotten so out of reach, Tony would have made better decisions. Of course he would have! He would not have felt the pressure to bring the team back by himself. A quarterback like the Mike Vick of old, or like RGIII, or even Aaron Rodgers, might not feel the same pressure Romo did because if a pass isn’t there, they can make a play with their legs. Tony Romo is not that style of quarterback.

Dez Bryant has been beyond disappointing this year. Props to Jason Witten for fighting through his spleen injury, but he has been dropping too many passes this season. Miles Austin has been reliable, but the Cowboys have yet to game plan around him, and I’m not sure I can explain why; I need a Cowboys fan to do that for me.

But in all this I’ve been focused on the Cowboys’ offensive woes. To be fair, their defense was pretty putrid last night, too. Before I get into that, though, I do have to give credit to the Bears defense. Even though they didn’t really have to fight for any of Romo’s five interceptions, they still had to catch the ball and that deserves a bit of credit. Yet I still hesitate to give them too much credit because the best player on the Cowboys last night was Brian Moorman, the punter. When you don’t have to defend against anything, how much praise have you really earned?

On to the Cowboys defense, oh where do I begin? They sacked Cutler twice, but outside of that didn’t really put him under too much duress after the first quarter. The Cowboys, on 14 carries, were tackled behind the line of scrimmage four times. They were only able to return the favor once, and the Bears rushed twice as many times as Dallas did!

Perhaps the most important failure was that Dallas didn’t make the Bears drive on them (both of Chicago’s offensive touchdowns came from 30+ yards away and the Bears gained 8 fewer first downs than the Cowboys did over the course of the whole game). Chicago had just one drive in which they made it into the red zone and they had to settle for a field goal. Had Dallas forced the Bears to sustain more drives and get down into a shorter field, perhaps this game would have been closer.

But the game really isn’t as close as the score suggests. Kyle Orton relieved Romo late in the game and threw a garbage-time touchdown pass to Jason Witten. Then Dez Bryant was on the receiving end of the two-point conversion. Chicago won this by four possessions as far as I’m concerned.

The Cowboys have a lot to be concerned about moving forward, primarily with their receiving corps. Chicago is off the hook for this week, but I’m still not sold on ‘da Bears.’ Inconsistent doesn’t last long in the NFL. If you’re inconsistent early, you almost always turn consistently bad by the latter part of the season.

No comments:

Post a Comment