Peyton Manning or Tom Brady? The debate has gone on for years. |
Cory Puffett
I’ll be honest, after the way the Patriots whooped Peyton
Manning’s butt last week I toyed with the idea of not writing this at all. Tom
Brady didn’t play a great game, but he played a great third quarter. Peyton
Manning didn’t play a great game; in fact, he played a horrid game.
But one game does not define a career; one game does not
change who or what a given player is.
Peyton Manning is great. Tom Brady is great. Whether you are
a Peyton fan, a Brady fan, or are not crazy about either, both of those statements
are absolutely accurate. Yes, I am going to make a case for why I think one is
a better quarterback than the other. But I hope it is clear that I mean no
disrespect to either player. Both are great in their own right and I would be
shocked if either is not a first-ballot Hall of Famer.
Unless you don’t know me and have never read my blog, you
know that I am a huge Peyton Manning fan. He is my favorite professional
athlete. So I’ll understand if you consider my forthcoming argument to be biased.
For many years, it was.
But as I have matured (and I’m not done yet) as a football
analyst, I have realized that just because I like one more than the other, it
does not mean I have to believe that player is better than the other. In this
case, however, I truly believe Peyton Manning is a cut above Brady.
But why?
Argument for Tom
Brady
Brady fans always make the same argument. He has three Super
Bowl rings, five appearances, and has the most career playoff wins of any
quarterback in NFL history.
These stats are all well and good, and I’m not going to open
a can of worms by bringing up Spygate. Whether that has anything to do with New
England’s recent playoff struggles, I don’t think it matters in looking at Tom
Brady. These are all team
achievements. If anything, I think it is more telling that the Patriots have
struggled in the playoffs since their defense regressed from the great units
they had in the early 2000s.
Argument for Peyton
Manning
Four MVPs.
Ridiculous. How is this an argument? While MVPs are much
more telling of an individual player’s achievements than are Super Bowls and
win percentages, the MVP award is also very circumstantial. Though Peyton
absolutely earned every one of those four awards, there were other quarterbacks
that were as, or nearly as, deserving as Peyton in three of those four seasons.
Again, this is not a sound argument.
Comparing Peyton
& Tom
Peyton Manning entered the league two seasons before Tom
Brady. Brady did not start any games in his rookie season. They have each
missed, essentially, a full season (for all intents and purposes, Brady missed
the entire 2008 season).
So Manning has 15 seasons under his belt while Brady has 12
(this includes the 11 games each has played this season). Because of this
disparity we cannot use career numbers such as total yards, total touchdowns,
etc. Instead, we’ll look mostly at per/season statistics.
Yards per Season
Peyton – 4213.9
Tom – 3968.3 (-245.6)
Touchdowns per Season
Peyton – 31.5
Tom – 29.25 (-2.25)
Interceptions per Season
Tom – 10.8
Peyton – 14.4 (+3.6)
Career Completions
Percentage
Peyton – 65.4%
Tom – 63.5% (-1.9)
Career Passer Rating
Peyton – 96.7
Tom – 95.9 (-0.8)
Overall, these stats are pretty inconclusive. Though Peyton
leads four of the five, his completion percentage and passer rating are not
that far ahead. And though Peyton does lead in yards per season by a pretty
sizeable margin, Tom has a little better TD/INT radio, at 2.68 to 2.19 for
Manning.
So let’s look at the playoffs. Tom Brady has played 24 playoff
games, compared to 20 for Peyton Manning. This time, we’ll look at per game
stats.
Yards per Game
Peyton – 284.0
Tom – 247.9 (-36.1)
Touchdowns per Game
Tom – 1.75
Peyton – 1.60 (-0.15)
Interceptions per Game
Tom – 0.9
Peyton – 1.1 (+0.2)
Completion Percentage
Peyton – 63.2
Tom – 62.3 (-0.9)
Passer Rating
Peyton – 88.4
Tom – 87.4 (-1.0)
Again, these numbers are fairly inconclusive. However, I
will point out that Peyton has a better career passer rating in the playoffs
despite throwing for slightly fewer touchdowns and slightly more interceptions
per game, which is interesting.
So this all brings me to…
My Pro Manning
Arguments
1
You can take or leave what I am about to say. At this point,
it truly does become slightly more based in opinion and slightly less based in
fact. I’ve explained why I don’t believe that Super Bowls, MVPs, or win
percentages can be used as the foundation of an argument over who is the better
quarterback.
I’ve also shown that, (a) despite Brady being heralded as
the greatest playoff quarterback of all time, Peyton’s numbers are every bit as
good, as well as (b) despite Manning being called the greatest regular season
quarterback of all time, Brady isn’t all that far off in a lot of categories.
In fact, Brady is right on Manning’s tail in other categories I didn’t even
mention, such as game-winning drives per season.
My argument is based on mechanics. Starting with pocket
awareness and the footwork needed to use that awareness to his advantage. I
argue strongly that Peyton Manning is the second best active quarterback in
both of these categories. Ben Roethlisberger is the only player who can move
around inside the pocket at a higher
level than Manning. Peyton always has his feet moving in the pocket, ready to
pivot, turn his hips, climb the pocket, side step…anything he needs to do to
avoid the rush.
You’ll argue that Manning has had consistently better
blocking than Tom Brady is. Though that certainly wasn’t true for the final
three years or so of Manning’s time as a starter in Indianapolis, it was
absolutely true earlier in his career. But is there a line in football that can
give up less than 20 sacks a season every
season? Well, even with the poorer lines he had late in his career as a
Colt, and the poor line he’s dealt with this season, Peyton has only been
sacked about 18 times per season, compared to about 28 times per season for
Brady.
Blame the lines all you want, but considering how many fewer
drop backs Brady has than Manning each season, I firmly believe pocket presence
is the bigger factor here.
2
My next argument has to do with football IQ. Again, this is
not a knock on Tom Brady. I just consider Peyton’s to be a little higher. I’ll
admit that sometimes it works to Manning’s disadvantage because he tries to do too
much. Peyton opened the door for the no-huddle offense to become commonplace in
the NFL. Both quarterbacks run it efficiently. But the style that New England
runs is much more basic. That’s not to say that basic isn’t effective. It
clearly has been in New England. But Manning runs a much more complex style of
no-huddle and it’s mind-numbing that he can keep all the calls straight.
When he was in Indianapolis, I heard and read stories on a
weekly basis about how Peyton or his receiver would realize that the defense
has caught on to one or more of their signals. Manning’s off-the-charts
football IQ allowed him to take those signals, and change them to mean
something else that would not negatively impact the blocking and other routes
on the play. It may not sound hard, but it’s not easy to change something on
the fly like that and not have receivers crossing paths or blocking assignments
missed.
I’ve never heard of Brady doing anything like this. Coach
Belichick is in control of that team. Knowing Belichick’s ego, or lack thereof,
if Brady had the ability to do that on the fly the way Peyton does, he wouldn’t
stop Brady from doing so.
3
Defenses. Peyton hasn’t had them, Brady has. The Patriots
had top 10 defenses for their 2003 and 2004 Super Bowl years, and though their
defense wasn’t highly ranked in 2001, they did give up the 6th
fewest points that season.
During Indy’s 2006 Super Bowl season, the defense was ranked
21st in yards allowed and 23rd in points allowed. The
offensive run game was ranked 18th in yards. Peyton won despite
them.
During New England’s 2007 16-0 season, the defense was
ranked 4th in both yards and points allowed. Brady lost in the Super
Bowl despite them.
Now again, these are single games. The Colts stepped up in
the playoffs in 2006, and Manning didn’t have a particularly great Super Bowl
performance. And New England’s offense as a whole played bad in the 2007 Super
Bowl, it wasn’t just Brady. But it may convince some of you that Peyton isn’t
the only one who has played poorly in a few important games.
4
My final argument is based on coaching, and it might be my
weakest one, which is why I saved it for last.
Bill Belichick will be a first ballot Hall of Famer. Tony
Dungy may find himself in Canton one day, but he won’t make it on his first
ballot. He was never a great coach.
He was a good coach made more popular by his strong faith and work with
Fellowship of Christian Athletes.
As for Jim Caldwell, I can’t imagine anybody would disagree
when I say Peyton carried him to the Super Bowl.
We all saw what happened to Caldwell when Peyton was
unavailable in 2011. I doubt Dungy, a defensive coach who never seemed to put a
particularly good unit together, would have done much better.
Bill Belichick managed to win 10 games with Matt Cassel at
quarterback in 2008. Let me be clear: I am not
saying that Tom Brady is a product of Belichick’s system. I’m just saying that
Belichick’s offensive system is built so that quarterbacks of different
abilities can succeed and won’t cause the rest of the offense to suffer. But it
does make me wonder if Brady would have a .773 regular season winning
percentage if Belichick weren’t his coach.
Conclusion
Goes against my prior arguments, but with recent playoff woes, this may be a fair solution. |
Again, I have a great level of respect for both of these
players. Both of them play huge roles in the history of the NFL. Other current
quarterbacks like Drew Brees, Aaron Rodgers and Ben Roethlisberger are also
very good, maybe as good right now, and may be compared to Manning and Brady
one day in terms of career accomplishments.
You look at the great quarterbacks of the past. Dan Marino
is considered one of the best despite never winning a Super Bowl. Joe Montana
only had a few big-number seasons in his career, and managed not to have his
numbers shoot up even once Jerry Rice came to town. John Elway may be the most
clutch quarterback of all time.
And of course you have to talk about Johnny Unitas, Bart
Starr, Otto Graham and others.
But Manning and Brady will likely go down as the best two to
ever play the game. It would be a damn shame if we all do what I used to do,
hope one fails so the one I prefer will be remembered as the greatest.
So while I won’t ever be hoping for Brady to fail, I am
going to stick to my guns and my sincere belief that Peyton Manning is the
better of the two active NFL greats, at least until further notice.